Date: Mon, 7 Oct 1996 11:50:42 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: wollman@lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) Cc: terry@lambert.org, ache@nagual.ru, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, bde@zeta.org.au Subject: Re: I plan to change random() for -current (was Re: rand() and random()) Message-ID: <199610071850.LAA14614@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <9610071829.AA06015@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> from "Garrett Wollman" at Oct 7, 96 02:29:49 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> Well, it sounds like "golden code" syndrome.... > > > It *is* "golden code syndrome". > > > That doesn't make it any less of a valid argument. > > I would say it's more like Terry bitching like he usually does about > somebody making a piece of code act like it's supposed to on the > grounds that someone, somewhere actually depends on the bugs in it. > I for one am quite sick of your whining. > > Around here we call that attitude ``UNIX Hacker bug #78''. With respect, Garrett, I'm the one who usually bitches about code *not* actinlg "like it's supposed to". I'm probably most famous for complaining about the BSD 4.4-Lite VFS code, as integrated by CSRG, not acting like John Heidemann's thesis (the design document) dictates it should act. However, I will argue against change when the historical behaviour is "important". I will note for the record that most of the refusal to adopt SVR4 conventions, like the init level abstraction, are a result of inertia: general support for historical BSD'isms, without regard to technical merit. Here we have an issue where the technical merit is relative: it depends on if you depends on the "random" behaviour" or if you depends on the "pseudo" behaviour. This is the main ideological debate. Again, with respect, "act like it's supposed to" is relative in this case. Unlike the VFS code, where CSRG has provably damaged the implementation -- demonstrable by even a cursory examination of the design document it purports to implement -- and which you have actively prevented me from correcting. This is not simply "Terry bitching". Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610071850.LAA14614>