Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:07:46 -0600 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: James Smallacombe <up@3.am> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: named "error sending response: not enough free resources" Message-ID: <6201873e1001281207o6071426ud29a9de5b02424e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1001281351590.95602@ns3.pil.net> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1001271322250.29151@ns3.pil.net> <979FD2CE-FCCE-4C61-8FA8-74D75E091C43@mac.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1001271604460.73419@ns3.pil.net> <D588AADC-6C59-4A60-BD2A-05ECF6E7A571@mac.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1001281351590.95602@ns3.pil.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:59 PM, James Smallacombe <up@3.am> wrote: > To follow up on this: Noticed the issue again this morning, which also was > accompanied by latency so high that I could not connect (some pings got > through at very high latency). I emailed the provider and they told me that > they had my port on their Ether switch set to 10Mbs. They switched it to > 100Mbs and only time will tell if that fixes it. > > Does this sound like it could be the entire cause? I ask because I've > maxed out pipes before, but never seen it shut all traffic down this much. > One key difference that I forgot to mention is that this server is running > TWO instances of named, on two different IPs (for different domains), each > running a few hundred zones. > > Bottom line: Would congestion cause this issue, or would this issue cause > congestion? > I would guess no, but that guess could easily be wrong. Have you tried turning up the logging to verbosity to get a better idea of what's happening? -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6201873e1001281207o6071426ud29a9de5b02424e>