Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 12:57:15 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: Eduardo Viruena Silva <mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: latex2html problems (fwd) Message-ID: <20041010095715.GA37455@gothmog.gr> In-Reply-To: <20041010032646.V49232@Gina.esfm.ipn.mx> References: <20041008083101.V52129@Gina.esfm.ipn.mx> <20041008182312.GA1327@moo.holy.cow> <20041010032646.V49232@Gina.esfm.ipn.mx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2004-10-10 03:39, Eduardo Viruena Silva <mrspock@esfm.ipn.mx> wrote: > I have a Phedora Core 2 system where latex2html works fine. It uses > netpbm-9.24 not netpbm-10.24 as FreeBSD does. > > So... forced FreeBSD to uninstall netpbm-10.24, and then downloaded > and compiled netpbm-9.24. > > It is a little tricky because netpbm does not supports FreeBSD, so I > took "openbsd" option and changed the Makefile.config to fulfill > FreeBSD requirements. > > Once it was installed, latex2html worked fine. > > Now, I do not know what to think. Either, latex2html is trying to use > options that do not work with netpbm-10.24, or netpbm-10.24 does not > work properly. > > I think this deserves a report. Please, do file a report for netpbm-10.24 using the send-pr(1) utility. Make sure you put "ports" (without the quotes) in the "Category:" field of your report and write a short description of the bug in the "Synopsis:" field. Add any other details you consider significant, such as versions of the TeX and latex2html ports you used, any options you used when installing the ports, a minimal sample LaTeX document that can be used to see if the latex2html conversion works, etc. Thanks for taking the time to check the older versions of netpbm :-) - Giorgos
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041010095715.GA37455>