Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 14:04:48 -0200 From: Cassiano Peixoto <peixotocassiano@gmail.com> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: pkg issue after FreeBSD 11 upgrade Message-ID: <CAJajdNWPLJuVwNNgikqsrSW2-u-atyX8jE59En97ffCzePQFNA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJajdNWE81Urs3ZT4-sTPSopkYNZegtH08Ur6ShLYfXsFQ7bAg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJajdNUJGgcmvetRFNbtcpwBkzcyArMSg4F2bBELs=qHH1pB=w@mail.gmail.com> <4c16c960-3b4a-75ab-41ed-51c8109b940a@FreeBSD.org> <CAJajdNV1xLovnx-GRLPR-H4muFgxMCSQrqri4FagyfdtMTv3Ww@mail.gmail.com> <CAJajdNUOg_HMboH563=GSK1QzzcV0v_5WV3v8=Vj7Tk9Rvp32A@mail.gmail.com> <20170830124855.ph5cca5pwjd2pphf@ivaldir.net> <CAJajdNXRx6S9xKgcouoPiWSjm_dBp5L0HZx8kW4iWPS7MpGCPw@mail.gmail.com> <20170830125950.mcp34sddcp6c757t@ivaldir.net> <CAJajdNU4n1a1NBDoSJA=m8Cg6fXYN-d%2BfHGeYFF1x7MLV1CTrQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170830143426.r53pztrybmmvfy6c@ivaldir.net> <CAJajdNWE81Urs3ZT4-sTPSopkYNZegtH08Ur6ShLYfXsFQ7bAg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Baptiste, Sorry to bother you. Did you have some time to work on this thread? Thanks. On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Cassiano Peixoto < peixotocassiano@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you for your support Baptiste, I really appreciate that. > > As same as HANDLE_RC_SCRIPTS option the new one should be handled > carefully. > > Please keep us posted when it's ready. > > > On Wednesday, August 30, 2017, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:07:51AM -0300, Cassiano Peixoto wrote: >> > Ok I know about HANDLE_RC_SCRIPTS, it's a good approach. But how to deal >> > with when I need to restart a service without upgrading? Reaper >> > functionnality is a trouble for many administrators who made meta ports >> to >> > manage their servers. I really think it could be a option to be >> > enabled/disabled. Can you see this possibility? >> > >> >> Yes I could add an option to disable the reaper functionnality (and will >> probably to unblock such use case as soon as I have time to do it.) >> >> However I still think this is not the right idea :) and a better one >> could be >> found >> >> Bapt >> >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJajdNWPLJuVwNNgikqsrSW2-u-atyX8jE59En97ffCzePQFNA>