Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Jul 1999 11:13:29 -0600
From:      Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc:        "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG>, Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: securelevel and ipfw zero
Message-ID:  <199907271713.LAA25874@mt.sri.com>
In-Reply-To: <199907270316.UAA49808@apollo.backplane.com>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907262311020.35843-100000@janus.syracuse.net> <199907270316.UAA49808@apollo.backplane.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> :That doesn't mean we shouldn't allow people to have an unsophisticated setup,
> :just because a sophisticated one is available. It would be useful to have
> :a per-firewall-rule counter, decrement it on each match if logging and
> :set, and be able to reset to something higher.
> :
> : Brian Fundakowski Feldman      _ __ ___ ____  ___ ___ ___  
> 
>     There may be some confusion here.  I am advocating that we *allow* the
>     zeroing of counters at secure level 3.

Sorry Matt, I missed that in my previous posting as well....  Ignore my
previous followup.



Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907271713.LAA25874>