Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:19:06 -0500 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> To: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/rdesktop pkg-plist Message-ID: <20050310191906.GG48850@toxic.magnesium.net> In-Reply-To: <42309B5B.7020201@FreeBSD.org> References: <200503101905.j2AJ5B6R013928@repoman.freebsd.org> <42309B5B.7020201@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> (03.10.2005 @ 1409 PST): Florent Thoumie said, in 1.2K: << > David E. O'Brien wrote: > >obrien 2005-03-10 19:05:11 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > net/rdesktop pkg-plist > > Log: > > Sort the keymaps. > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.5 +32 -32 ports/net/rdesktop/pkg-plist > > This is your third commit to get rdesktop updated > in two days. > > There was a PR pending with a patch included. Maintainer > has been cc'ed. > > Please respect ownership when not working on your ports, > or at least wait for maintainer timeout before applying > your changes. >> end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/net/rdesktop pkg-plist" from Florent Thoumie << Sorting the pkg-plist is a trivial change, and was the maintainer's responsibility in the first place. Asking for maintainer approval for trivial fixes supports a level of bureaucracy that, while nice in concept, simple prevents people from applying trivial fixes. Note that I'm not commenting on David's other commits to rdesktop; I haven't looked at them. Note also that I do not know what is in the PR. My only argument here is that committers should not feel like applying trivial fixes and routine maintenance to the ports tree amounts to stepping on someone's toes. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org http://www.vectors.cx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050310191906.GG48850>