Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 04 Feb 2018 16:38:59 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        python@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 225217] [NEW PORT] security/py-pycryptodomex: Cryptographic library for Python
Message-ID:  <bug-225217-21822-jgKo8L5XIW@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-225217-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-225217-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D225217

John W. O'Brien <john@saltant.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #189798|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |
 Attachment #190318|                            |maintainer-approval+
              Flags|                            |

--- Comment #1 from John W. O'Brien <john@saltant.com> ---
Created attachment 190318
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D190318&action=
=3Dedit
security/py-pycryptodomex: New port

The overall description and QA results are the same as before. This patch is
simpler and more robust thanks in large part to improvements upstream.

Notes
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

* Don't set LICENSE because trying to satisfy portlint in a slave seems a
futile exercise.
* Reuse the distfile from the master and create file to trigger alternate
namespace behavior.
* security/py-pycryptodome and security/py-pycryptodome should have a common
MAINTAINER.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-225217-21822-jgKo8L5XIW>