Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 11:41:56 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230432] [NEW PORT] net/ceph13: Ceph delivers object, block, and file storage in a unified system (Mimic 13.x) Message-ID: <bug-230432-7788-DfmO5oDCoi@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-230432-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-230432-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230432 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|needs-qa | --- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Willem Jan Withagen from comment #2) It's less 'continuously renaming', and more 'cut new fooX port from the main port every major version'. Users can then decide to switch the origin of the package/port if they don't want to go through the major version, and=20 update/switch back again at a later date if they want. But the choice is yours, and there's no *major* issue with fooX/fooY with no 'foo', except users may expect there to be a 'foo' (without a suffix). As for how to move/rename, if you decide to go that path... That can take the form of a separate issue (reference this one in See Also field) with title: net/ceph: Move to ceph12 If you'd like to create the patch for that, the svn diff would be the output after: svn mv net/ceph net/ceph12 edit net/Makefile entry (update net/ceph to net/ceph12) edit MOVED file (add MOVED entry) Alternatively the committer assigning themselves can take of it, just provi= de a reason for the move, such as: "Multiple supported major branches" Hope that helps, don't hesitate to ask if anything needs clarifying --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-230432-7788-DfmO5oDCoi>