Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 18:40:57 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, sos@freebsd.dk, julian@whistle.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SUID-Directories patch Message-ID: <199711141840.LAA11596@usr05.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <199711140248.TAA12336@rocky.mt.sri.com> from "Nate Williams" at Nov 13, 97 07:48:09 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > One of the main incentives for commercial entities to give code > > back is offloading of maintenance. You can of course pick and > > choose what you want to take, but the fix seems generically > > useful > > And is in 3.0-current, but doesn't belong in 2.2. On the flip side, > just because a commercial entity donates code doesn't mean we should > take it into the source tree lock/stock/and barrel. Uh... that's what I said. 8-). It's why I pointed out that I thought it wass generically useful (I admit that it's generically useful mostly for administrators of Samba and Appletalk servers, if that's any consolation. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711141840.LAA11596>