Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 23:38:17 +0100 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net> To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mesa compiler specification Message-ID: <20190121223817.GB2502@elch.exwg.net> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1vpY=UU9pWRbTiNsjg4-skHL65VRkRQtCTxxFxVQUh7vw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAN6yY1vpY=UU9pWRbTiNsjg4-skHL65VRkRQtCTxxFxVQUh7vw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
## Kevin Oberman (rkoberman@gmail.com): > I do have one question/request... Can the mesa ports be updated to allow > compilation with either llvm60 or llvm70? +1 for that. > The way the port is written, using a hard version number in > Makefile.common, there is no easy way to pick either 60 or 70. I had to do > an edit (one character) to switch. I am not in any way a ports or Makefile > expert, but could this be changed to use something like > COMPILER_VERSION=70 and ALT_COMPILER_VERSION=60 or something similar to > allow llvm60 to be used when it has been installed and llvm70 has not? bsd.default-versions.mk has LLVM_DEFAULT - wouldn't it be best to use that (and include mesa-related ports in regression testing when switching to llvm80)? Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190121223817.GB2502>