Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 03 Sep 2001 15:45:32 +0900
From:      Kazutaka YOKOTA <yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp>
To:        Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org, yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CHANGES AFFECTING MOST -CURRENT USERS 
Message-ID:  <200109030645.PAA28756@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:58:59 MST." <200108300258.f7U2wxq06147@mass.dis.org> 
References:  <200108300258.f7U2wxq06147@mass.dis.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>The loader now detects ACPI in your system, and loads the ACPI
>module if it is present.  This has major ramifications for the
>device probe and attach phases of system initialisation.
>
> - Root PCI bridges are detected using ACPI.
> - PCI interrupt routing is now performed using ACPI.
> - The PnP BIOS is disabled and onboard peripherals are detected
>   using ACPI, and attach to ACPI and not isa.
> - System-owned resources are detected and reserved by ACPI.

Then, shouldn't we remove the PnP BIOS driver (pnpbios) from the
kernel and make it a module, so that the boot loader will load either
the ACPI module or the PnP BIOS module?

Kazu

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109030645.PAA28756>