Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 10:01:42 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: why omshell when no dhcpd ? Message-ID: <200505201001.50476.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20050519.094353.120174404.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20815.1116509187@critter.freebsd.dk> <20050519.094353.120174404.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1284406.9fWdR6cE4h Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, 20 May 2005 01:13, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20815.1116509187@critter.freebsd.dk> > > Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes: > : Why do we have the omshell program in the base system when dhcpd is not > : there ? > > Because you can use it with dhclient. Although you need a degree in brain engineering to acttually figure out how= =20 8-) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1284406.9fWdR6cE4h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCjS/25ZPcIHs/zowRAj2SAJ9qbm4kqo0tWzmH2TKjsb/57JDmAwCfTIqu /q5PK8FWidSutIWdU3Ba5Ow= =1mch -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1284406.9fWdR6cE4h--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200505201001.50476.doconnor>