Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:06:57 -0400 From: Thomas Abthorpe <tabthorpe@FreeBSD.org> To: Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org>, chromium@freebsd.org Subject: Re: the last mile? Message-ID: <AANLkTikf6m-XDa0dUDpfCMTtaecUn5BBXS8yzpGnomj_@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D941F6B.3040901@freebsd.org> References: <4D9239F7.7020204@freebsd.org> <4D941F6B.3040901@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Agreed, our test base has got us this far, opening it up to the wider community will surely be helpful. Thomas On 3/31/11, Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> wrote: > Op 29-03-2011 21:58, Rene Ladan schreef: >> Hi, >> >> in its current state chromium-10.0.648.X looks pretty decent IMO. >> > [..] > >> The biggest todo for chromium-10.0.648.X is to get it render pages on >> 8.2 and below. I guess someone with a big machine should build a debug >> image and/or see what's different libthr on 7.4/8.2 versus CURRENT. >> > What if we just commit the port _right now_ after marking it BROKEN on > 7.X/8.X ? In it's current form nobody can really use the version in the > Ports Tree (or they would have to remove the FORBIDDEN line), if we > commit this version at least some people can. And we might get more > eyes to look at this timeout bug. > > Maybe it's a bad idea... > > Regards, > Ren=E9 > -- > http://www.rene-ladan.nl:8080/ > > GPG fingerprint =3D ADBC ECCD EB5F A6B4 549F 600D 8C9E 647A E564 2BFC > (subkeys.pgp.net) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chromium > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chromium-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" > > --=20 Sent from my mobile device Thomas Abthorpe tabthorpe@goodking.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikf6m-XDa0dUDpfCMTtaecUn5BBXS8yzpGnomj_>