Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 5 May 2001 17:53:20 -0600 (Mountain Daylight Time)
From:      Charlie Watts <cewatts@frontier.net>
To:        Jan Mikkelsen <janm@transactionware.com>
Cc:        Doug Russell <drussell@saturn-tech.com>, Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: soft update should be default
Message-ID:  <Pine.WNT.4.33.0105051751530.1188-100000@eggplant.frontier.net>
In-Reply-To: <00b601c0d5bd$42ba1340$0901a8c0@haym.transactionsite.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
> Good write speed is possible without using write cache by using tagged
> command queueing.  Have you measured tagged command queueing vs. write cache
> for write speed on your SCSI drives?  I get about the same (~23MB/sec) on an
> IBM DLTA-307030 Ultra ATA drive (tags/no WC vs. no tags/WC).  With neither
> option, it is terrible, of course.

I see the same behaviour on one of those disks, too. But - aren't IBM's
DTLA-series disks the only IDE drives that support TCQ?

[ It's a -very- SCSI-feeling feature, in my mind. ]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.WNT.4.33.0105051751530.1188-100000>