Date: Thu, 8 Jun 1995 22:58:28 +1000 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: babkin@hq.icb.chel.su, bde@zeta.org.au Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Interval timer/System clock Message-ID: <199506081258.WAA25379@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> the others at rtprio 0. I think the priority doesn't affect swapping, >> so for consistent timing a real time process might want extra wakeups to >> keep itself in core and early wakeups to allow time for swapping it in; >Does mlock() not work in FreeBSD ? Or does it not help in this case ? I don't know a lot about this. John Dyson says that real time priority stops swapping but not paging. mlock() is supposed to work to stop paging. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506081258.WAA25379>