Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 11:37:41 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> Cc: Steven Hartland <smh@freebsd.org>, fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Changing the default for ZFS atime to off? Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK1b7tG5ZWsRKj6NDo-9agBKehwKcr88Zj3ude-LMEQm_Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGMYy3s9V_FYWBBoCPyak9DpM_XZJ_ReVrOZqgmGmJ_KzcKzVA@mail.gmail.com> References: <16FEF774EE8E4100AD2CAEC65276A49D@multiplay.co.uk> <CAGMYy3s9V_FYWBBoCPyak9DpM_XZJ_ReVrOZqgmGmJ_KzcKzVA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd suggest implementing relative atime in VFS layer first: > > > https://github.com/delphij/freebsd/commit/6a199821fbdbf424027499d4a0f8f113f6943e16 Cool, looks like you were already on this. I would offer to test some, but I'm pretty much ZFS only at this point. I imagine there would be much less objections to defaulting to relatime rather than noatime. AFAIK, relatime doesn't break any major tools. -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK1b7tG5ZWsRKj6NDo-9agBKehwKcr88Zj3ude-LMEQm_Q>