Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:56:47 +0300
From:      Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>
To:        pav@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Pietro Cerutti <gahr@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/java/eclipseme Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
Message-ID:  <20080318205647.19061b66.stas@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <1205859267.69439.66.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
References:  <200803180100.m2I10QTD070047@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080318193855.0439b197.stas@FreeBSD.org> <1205858588.69439.62.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20080318195033.06793ab2.stas@FreeBSD.org> <1205859267.69439.66.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:54:27 +0100
Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> mentioned:

> Stanislav Sedov p=C3=AD=C5=A1e v =C3=BAt 18. 03. 2008 v 19:50 +0300:
> > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:43:08 +0100
> > Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> mentioned:
> > >=20
> > > It will also change permissions on all files already present in the
> > > target directory, I think. Which might not be a desirable thing.
> > >=20
> >=20
> > Indeed, I know. That's why I'm asking if it'll be desirable.
>=20
> It's a COPYTREE_* bug that needs to be fixed, actually.
>=20

Why you think it's a bug? COPYTREE_* was intentionally designed to set
specific permissions on files written.

Of course, we can implement a version of COPYTREE that doesn't set any
permissions on files, but it'll be effectively just a 'cp -rf'.

--=20
Stanislav Sedov
ST4096-RIPE



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080318205647.19061b66.stas>