Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:43:15 -0400 From: Thomas Dickey <dickey@radix.net> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sshd should not use TCP_NODELAY Message-ID: <20040608214315.GB17154@saltmine.radix.net> In-Reply-To: <20040608201124.GA18439@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200406081157.i58BvGJd012588@dungeon.home> <20040608122735.GA10813@nagual.pp.ru> <20040608153838.GF23083@green.homeunix.org> <20040608201124.GA18439@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 12:11:24AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 11:38:38AM -0400, Brian Feldman wrote: > > be set on both ends. I don't think TCP_NODELAY is really the problem, > > but I bet that without it there would be enough delay in-between various > > multi-character control sequences (arrow keys, etc.) that they'd > > become useless. >=20 > No. I use PuTTY client with TCP_NODELAY off and remote FreeBSD ncurses and > termcap-based apps which accepts escape sequences without any single > problem. that's a (by default) 1-second timeout. --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFAxjLytIqByHxlDocRAlFMAKCRQdYGdadbQyE1VZblg0tPmygdRACeLWt+ 9OIEWdwJ4vFejOeCq/gYdGg= =kUPF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040608214315.GB17154>