Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 12:51:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: nectar@freebsd.org, standards@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFR] correct type of addrinfo.ai_addrlen and netent.n_net Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0505311248570.3368-100000@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <86fyw32yqm.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 31 May 2005, [iso-8859-1] Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org> writes: > > No, it is not blind bump. The following libraries refers > > getaddrinfo(3), thus should be bumped: > > > > =09=09=09RELENG_5=09HEAD=09Need to Bump > > [...] > > libpam=09=09=092=09=092 > > =09pam_radius=09=09=09=09o > > =09pam_unix=09=09=09=09o > > You can't just bump libpam; you need to bump all the modules along > with it, because libpam will only load modules with the same major > number as itself. In fact, there is only a single SHLIB_MAJOR for the > entire src/lib/libpam tree, in src/lib/libpam/Makefile.inc. > > Is it really necessary to remove the padding? It gives us a lot of > trouble for zero gain. And sometimes we put padding in place to allow for expansion (ucontext for one). I think the padding should stay. If we ever get symbol versioning, then you can remove it without having to bump library versions. --=20 DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.43.0505311248570.3368-100000>