Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:34:42 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Charles Sprickman <spork@bway.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.1 quota issues Message-ID: <20060710073442.GG37822@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSX.4.61.0607100137200.3261@white.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com> References: <Pine.OSX.4.61.0607072227510.3261@white.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com> <20060708085132.GD98476@over-yonder.net> <Pine.OSX.4.61.0607100039100.3261@white.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com> <20060710052513.GF37822@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <Pine.OSX.4.61.0607100137200.3261@white.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--djTb5EnuS5qMpC9h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 01:39:01AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote: >=20 > >On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 12:41:07AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote: > >>On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > >> > >>>On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:56:47PM -0400 I heard the voice of > >>>Charles Sprickman, and lo! it spake thus: > >>>> > >>>>Trying again, it reported the same inconsistencies then sat there > >>>>for more than an hour taking up all the available CPU on the box > >>>>until I killed it. The mtime on quota.user had not changed during > >>>>the run. > >>> > >>>FWIW, I saw this on a box I setup running a late November -CURRENT > >>>last year; I could never get the quotas setup and running right > >>>because the check always just looped itself up. The partition they're > >>>on has about 3 gig used out of ~45, with maybe a dozen users. I never > >>>spent much time on it, since it's just a personal box, and the quotas > >>>are mostly just to provide a handy measure of who's using what (no > >>>limits set). I just gave it up and decided to worry about it later. > >> > >>What should I do here? It's consistently failing. What information > >>should I gather to forumulate a PR that won't burden the assignee with > >>lots of troubleshooting mess? The machine is not in production, but th= ere > >>is user data on it. I could allow a trusted developer access to it, or > >>even create another jail to illustrate the problem. > > > >It is not clear from your report whether you run fsck on the problem > >partition. I think (and my view is backed by "unexpected inconsistencies" > >message) that this is the must. >=20 > Sorry about that, I did not mention it, but thinking the same thing you= =20 > did, I unmounted the partition and fsck'd twice for good measure. Both= =20 > runs came back clean. I think its quotacheck complaining about the=20 > quota.user file... Ok, please, show me uname -a, dmesg, /etc/fstab, mount -v. --djTb5EnuS5qMpC9h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEsgMRC3+MBN1Mb4gRAljPAKDo0HBrLl4PocFGkHKs7/5s6V6j1wCgui2t XuBXClUZ6DwWehntu9ycN+A= =ru/x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --djTb5EnuS5qMpC9h--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060710073442.GG37822>