Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:47:14 -0700 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= <ask@develooper.com> To: Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "kernel: carp_input: received len 20 < sizeof(struct carp_header)" messages Message-ID: <77F1671C-33AE-4AAB-8442-7653B00F7E04@develooper.com> In-Reply-To: <4CD36BD0.4040409@tomjudge.com> References: <17903237-CBF6-4CC3-8CA3-29D9BB65538F@develooper.com> <4CD36BD0.4040409@tomjudge.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 4, 2010, at 19:28, Tom Judge wrote: >> I checked that we don't have any overlapping vhid/vrid IDs. Any idea = for how to either just suppress the log message from the kernel or = getting it to log some more details so we can try to make the underlying = problem go away? >>=20 >=20 > Take a look at the following page: >=20 > http://www.tomjudge.com/index.php/FreeBSD/CARP_vs_VRRP >=20 > It contains a patch to change the CARP protocol ID to something that = is > not used so these messages go away. Hi Tom, Thank you for the reply. I was hoping we wouldn't have to rebuild the = kernel (doh) since we use a basically abandoned version of pfSense (the = pfSense team are for all their efforts and good work seemingly unable to = get a new release out the door). I agree that it was pretty dumb of the OpenBSD developers to just stomp = on another protocol ID for their (and ours in FreeBSD ...) = implementation. - ask --=20 http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?77F1671C-33AE-4AAB-8442-7653B00F7E04>