Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 12 Jun 2016 16:29:38 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 161499] [libstdc++] [patch] Use FreeBSD's atomic.h if no cpu-specific code is available
Message-ID:  <bug-161499-8-aTb4RBbPAp@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-161499-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-161499-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D161499

Pedro F. Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |Overcome By Events
                 CC|                            |ed@FreeBSD.org
             Status|In Progress                 |Closed

--- Comment #1 from Pedro F. Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org> ---
We now have a sys/stdatomic.h; I don't think we need such workarounds in
libstdc++.

In any case, all tier1 platforms have moved away from libstdc++ into libc++=
 so
if there are issues they should be treated upstream.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-161499-8-aTb4RBbPAp>