Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:15:57 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Alan Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> Subject: Re: Contigmalloc regression seen on latest 7.x and 8.x branches Message-ID: <4A4A2C2D.1070404@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <4A499EFD.9080509@cs.rice.edu> References: <200906292005.18629.hselasky@c2i.net> <4A4907AE.1080303@cs.rice.edu> <200906292130.16718.hselasky@c2i.net> <4A499EFD.9080509@cs.rice.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alan Cox wrote: > > After looking at r159130 and the comments in the code, I don't think it > would be appropriate to remove the printf()s. However, the logic that > determines whether printf() is called is flawed. I believe that the > attached patch should eliminate the incorrect printf()s that you are > seeing. > If this fixes the Hans' problem, then I'm quite happy with it going into the tree. There another pending busdma fix that I need to handle, so I can shepherd this one in at the same time if you'd like. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A4A2C2D.1070404>