Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 08:43:20 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220927] www/py-requests: Latest net/py-urllib3 update breaks version requirements, causing py-certbot / py-salt to fail to run Message-ID: <bug-220927-21822-ZOB1AyOEdM@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-220927-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-220927-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220927 --- Comment #21 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #18) I don't mind that method and it has the same issues with multiple patch-fil= es patching common files, patch ordering, etc so no real trade-off is obvious. The intent of my comment requirements is that patches are documented and referenced (to the extent that they can be), and reported upstream (where t= hey can be) and so that our future selves don't need to waste time hunting for = the 'why' behind the what. Both methods (comment in patch) or PATCHFILES is approved as long as the existing patches/comments are maintained and the patches are tested --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-220927-21822-ZOB1AyOEdM>