Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 22:20:00 GMT From: Marius Strobl <marius@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/186891: [puc] [patch] MCS9922 based card not known Message-ID: <201404102220.s3AMK04g052218@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/186891; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Marius Strobl <marius@freebsd.org> To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, bsd@dino.sk Cc: Subject: Re: kern/186891: [puc] [patch] MCS9922 based card not known Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:13:18 +0200 On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:26:56PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > Could you please revert your > patch for puc(4) and test whether the attached one provies you with > two instances of uart(4) for that card? > > Index: uart_bus_pci.c > =================================================================== > --- uart_bus_pci.c (revision 264257) > +++ uart_bus_pci.c (working copy) > @@ -135,6 +135,8 @@ > "MosChip MCS9901 PCIe to Peripheral Controller", 0x10 }, > { 0x9710, 0x9904, 0xa000, 0x1000, > "MosChip MCS9904 PCIe to Peripheral Controller", 0x10 }, > +{ 0x9710, 0x9922, 0x0000, 0x0000, > + "MosChip MCS9922 PCIe to Peripheral Controller", 0x10 }, > { 0xdeaf, 0x9051, 0xffff, 0, "Middle Digital PC Weasel Serial Port", 0x10 }, > { 0xffff, 0, 0xffff, 0, NULL, 0, 0} > }; I'm not sure whether the sub vendor and sub device IDs taken from NetBSD actually are correct. The MCS9922 datasheet suggests that the following should be used instead: +{ 0x9710, 0x9922, 0xa000, 0x1000, + "MosChip MCS9922 PCIe to Peripheral Controller", 0x10 }, Marius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201404102220.s3AMK04g052218>