Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 11:32:40 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> Cc: Bill Fumerola <billf@mu.org>, obrien@FreeBSD.org, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1 cgram.y decl.c emit.c emit1.c externs.h func.c init.c mem.c mem1.c scan.l tree.c src/usr.bin/xlint/lint2 chk.c hash.c main2.c msg.c read.c src/usr.bin/xlint/xlint xlint.c Message-ID: <63887.996053560@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 Jul 2001 11:31:33 %2B0200." <95780.996053493@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <95780.996053493@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>, Sheldon Hearn writes: > > >On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:31:01 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> I can't see any reason why the pre-commit check could whine if people attempt >> to take one or more files off vendorbranches, but on the other hand I would >> think that POLA dictates that we move _all_ vendor code under contrib > >Seconded. I know at least wollman [1] thinks that contrib/ is a mistake, >but let's at least make it consistently. > >[1] In fact, I'm coming around to wollman's point of view on this, but > I'm still in favour of consistency. I know and understand where he is coming from, unfortunately I don't share his belief that we can impose the precondition of committer infallibility. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?63887.996053560>