Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 01:04:13 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Aristedes Maniatis <ari@ish.com.au> Subject: Re: portmaster and IGNOREME Message-ID: <n2p7d6fde3d1004260104l3fed33d5lcf6b225adeb74eda@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4BD51929.2050807@FreeBSD.org> References: <4BD28512.2010506@ish.com.au> <4BD356AC.9080707@FreeBSD.org> <4BD37E1E.7010207@ish.com.au> <4BD39CD0.4040504@FreeBSD.org> <4BD39FDA.7070609@ish.com.au> <4BD4C85F.8010307@FreeBSD.org> <4BD4DB1A.3020706@ish.com.au> <4BD51929.2050807@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 04/25/10 17:15, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: >> On 26/04/10 8:55 AM, Doug Barton wrote: >>> I've just committed a fix for this problem to the svn (development) >>> version of portmaster. You can find information on how to download it a= t >>> http://dougbarton.us/portmaster-proposal.html. I would appreciate it if >>> you would test that version in your environment to confirm that the fix >>> is satisfactory. >> >> Firstly, it looks like it is unable to run with a relative path. Pretty >> minor issue, but I thought I'd mention it. > > yes, there is no way that will work. portmaster calls itself > recursively, so it has to have an explicit path when you start it. _portmaster=3D$(realpath "$0") ? ... "$_portmaster" foo >> But when using an absolute path >> =A0 =A0 # sh /root/portmaster -ai > > You could also chmod a+x /root/portmaster and then run it without the > sh, but the way you did it works fine too. > >> * I get the list of ports to upgrade, then "Proceed y/n", and after that >> it sees CGatePro and tries to upgrade it. > > Yes, I was too hasty to get the fix out the door. I just committed > version 207220 which has a more thorough fix for this issue in -a. > >> * when using portmaster -ai I'm still given a choice to upgrade the >> package with no ORIGIN. > > I changed the logic for -a to be warn+skip automatically if an +IGNOREME > file is present. For the case of no ORIGIN and no +IGNOREME it's back to > being a fatal error. > >> But why ask since we already know it will fail 100% of the time? > > Exactly right. Thanks, -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?n2p7d6fde3d1004260104l3fed33d5lcf6b225adeb74eda>