Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:39:31 -0500 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND 9 Message-ID: <87smoxxf30.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> In-Reply-To: <3F1ED7C5.5000500@zog.net> (John Morgan Salomon's message of "Wed, 23 Jul 2003 20:45:25 %2B0200") References: <8AE4DA75-BCC1-11D7-9DA1-000A957FF666@pacbell.net> <87d6g1zwt7.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> <1058980661.3981.0.camel@jupiter.main.gaddis.org> <3F1ED7C5.5000500@zog.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2003-07-23T18:45:25Z, John Morgan Salomon <john@zog.net> writes: > Unless you have a different instances listening on different > interfaces/IPs as master/slave for the same domain if you only have one > machine--some registrars will not permit master & slave on the same IP. Or > can BIND9 handle this in a single instance? Do said registrars actually verify that one IP is claiming to be authoritative while the other is non-authoritative? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQA/HtZj5sRg+Y0CpvERAisVAKCHlK+XGY+7JjrKeX/EUzYomV9uFgCYvXiV P1AeXmuvy3EdWms3vBtGTA== =BOU+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87smoxxf30.fsf>