Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:17:16 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 195121] graphics/linux-c6-gdk-pixbuf: rename to -pixbuf2 to avoid conflating with 0.22.0 Message-ID: <bug-195121-4077-Nx9gKFmQI7@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-195121-4077@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-195121-4077@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195121 --- Comment #11 from Johannes Jost Meixner <xmj@FreeBSD.org> --- > Why that is a problem? I haven't found a single linux- port that depends on libgdk_pixbuf.so.2 provided by gdk-pixbuf among both f10 and c6. Yeah, it isn't. I didn't know about gdk-pixbuf(1!) being a GNOME 1 "vestige". Just to make sure I understand the versions/provisioning of things correctly: * with linux-f10, linux-f10-gdk-pixbuf is GNOME1 and hence really old. * with linux-f10, gdk-pixbuf2 is provided by linux-f10-gtk2 * with linux-c6 (6.6 but not 6.5), gdk-pixbuf2 is provided by linux-c6-gdk-pixbuf * no linux-c6 port (so far) provides gdk-pixbuf (1!), and none seems needed ? Does that sound right? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-195121-4077-Nx9gKFmQI7>