Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 07:30:56 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: why omshell when no dhcpd ? Message-ID: <24292.1116567056@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 20 May 2005 10:01:42 %2B0930." <200505201001.50476.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200505201001.50476.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, "Daniel O'Connor" writes : >> Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes: >> : Why do we have the omshell program in the base system when dhcpd is not >> : there ? >> >> Because you can use it with dhclient. > >Although you need a degree in brain engineering to acttually figure out how > >8-) I usually just look in cat /var/db/dhclient.leases -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24292.1116567056>