Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 07:50:37 -0700 From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-CVSROOT@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT editinfo Message-ID: <199508211450.HAA01043@corbin.Root.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 21 Aug 95 07:28:12 PDT." <11085.809015292@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Accepted policy? Who accepted it?? The first I heard about it is with your >> "reminder". > >In all fairness to Rod, I remember this as our policy as well and I do >recall it being discussed when we first added the `Submitted By' and >`Obtained From' fields. We decided, according to my recollection, to >use the following methodology: Well, you know the first thing they say goes is your memory...but... >If you check the commit logs, I do believe that you'll find them to be >pretty consistent with this convention. Actually, it's quite a mixed bag...I've used the person's name since the beginning and I do a fair number of commits; other people used either the login or name+login. Honestly, I think it makes very little difference and I'm surprised that we're making an issue out of something so trivial. -DG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508211450.HAA01043>