Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 1 Dec 2000 20:15:51 +0100
From:      Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely8.cicely.de>
To:        Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
Cc:        Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>, Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Patch to make my PC164 booting.
Message-ID:  <20001201201551.A50042@cicely8.cicely.de>
In-Reply-To: <14887.61320.684175.222685@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>; from gallatin@cs.duke.edu on Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:40:27PM -0500
References:  <14887.6213.634085.237730@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011301933210.59011-100000@beppo.feral.com> <20001201193042.A49869@cicely8.cicely.de> <14887.61320.684175.222685@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:40:27PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> 
> Bernd Walter writes:
>  > On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 07:34:03PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> <..>
>  > +	if (strncmp(platform.model, "Digital AlphaPC 164 ", 20) == 0) {
> 
> 
> Something involving the variation might be better. Eg. 
> if ((hwrpb->rpb_variation & SV_ST_MASK) <= SV_ST_ALPHAPC164_500)

Sounds better.
We may also want to remove EB164 from the handling.
But I never heared from anyone owning one.

> BTW, does this problem affect the EB164 models too, or just the
> various non LX or SX PC164s?

The linux comment about brokeness is only for PC164 but AFAIK noone tested
on other EB164 based systems.
The best would be to test the other systems wethers it's needed and
if yes if it works.

-- 
B.Walter              COSMO-Project         http://www.cosmo-project.de
ticso@cicely.de         Usergroup           info@cosmo-project.de



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001201201551.A50042>