Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 13:52:03 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, marino@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: USE_GCC politic -- why so many ports has it as runtime dependency? Message-ID: <374714036.20140208135203@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <52F5FAD3.8090001@marino.st> References: <1133138786.20140207202949@serebryakov.spb.ru> <A136680D-BD8A-4819-9600-6B640AB16ADE@FreeBSD.org> <1228142552.20140208033432@serebryakov.spb.ru> <52F56EB9.4010700@marino.st> <1955647943.20140208122042@serebryakov.spb.ru> <52F5EB97.5040603@marino.st> <686179459.20140208132425@serebryakov.spb.ru> <52F5FAD3.8090001@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, John. You wrote 8 =D1=84=D0=B5=D0=B2=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=BB=D1=8F 2014 =D0=B3., 13:37:= 23: JM> No, it's all or nothing. And you are asking people to do a tremendous JM> amount of work to address a personal philosophy. While I can see value JM> in splitting out the gcc libraries into separate packages (especially JM> when subpackages come where one can package libraries separately for JM> free), It is best solution, of course. But what do I think: no pkgng could track, which shared librearties are REALLY used, maybe, we could add some intelelct to USE_GCC infrastructure to register runtime dependency (Ok, to full gcc package till we have subpackages) ONLY if one if ut libraries are REALLY used? As I've showed in previous message, package which surprises me, has FAKE gcc dependency! --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?374714036.20140208135203>