Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:16:36 -0300
From:      Aline de Freitas <aline@riseup.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: amd64 or i386 for desktop use?
Message-ID:  <200803051016.39822.aline@riseup.net>
In-Reply-To: <200803050036.33579.itz@mushinsky.net>
References:  <200803050036.33579.itz@mushinsky.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart4335001.INF35jzSLf
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Em Wednesday 05 March 2008 02:36:33 Isaac Mushinsky escreveu:
> I have new hardware (Abit ip35-pro, Intel Q6600), and was contemplating
> installing FreeBSD/arch, but now realise that I am going to have some
> problems.
>
> My nvidia card will not be of much use (GeForce 8500GT), since
> nvidia-drivers are not there for amd64, and the open source nv driver does
> not even support XVideo extension for these cards. I can downgrade to a nv
> 7xxx series card, which works better with the open driver. I do not mind
> loss of 3D support, but would need basic things like mplayer.
>
> So my questions are:
> 1. Should I get nvidia 7xxx or an ATI card? Which card is most likely to
> work reasonably well? No fancy features required, but may be appreciated
> later.=20
I prefer ATI ones, like r300, in which works out-of-the-box with the=20
opensource xf86-video-ati.=20

> 2. Any problems with flash plugin (flash7 for now, I do not mean the=20
> confounded flash9 headache)?
flash7 through nspluginwrapper works fine with firefox compiled by ports.
flash9 is working through windows firefox (via wine).

> 3. Other casual desktop user problems I should be aware of?

> 4. Is it worth it? Perhaps I should stay with i386, but it is a pity not =
to
> be able to use the new machine to its full potential.
With amd64 you'll not get wine, VESA, boot splash screen and maybe more stu=
ff.=20
Even googleearth I couldn't make it work in amd64. So I think it's not a go=
od=20
idea to use amd64 as a desktop.=20

>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



=2D-=20
Aline de Freitas - Chave p=FAblica: ID DE632016 / keys.indymedia.org
gpg --keyserver keys.indymedia.org --recv-keys DE632016

--nextPart4335001.INF35jzSLf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD)

iEYEABECAAYFAkfOnTcACgkQhLRvs95jIBbuDACfQJbvjAuBQC1h0rD8WJvBBkW9
zRgAn2y27AeLZqBGIT22rCRiGd/N4tWP
=WWDE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart4335001.INF35jzSLf--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200803051016.39822.aline>