Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 09:16:19 +1000 From: Dima Panov <fluffy@ael.ru> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: java v. procfs Message-ID: <200804011016.20303.fluffy@ael.ru> In-Reply-To: <1d3ed48c0803282143k75c475a1i1bd5ffa99a26463e@mail.gmail.com> References: <1d3ed48c0803282143k75c475a1i1bd5ffa99a26463e@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29 March 2008, Kevin Downey wrote: > I was having trouble getting java to work and I googled and found a > site that said they don't mix. When I unmounted /proc java started > working. I would kind of like to have both since /proc is needed for > gnome. > > > % sudo mount -t procfs null /proc > % java -cp /usr/local/share/java/classes/jline.jar:clojure.jar > jline.ConsoleRunner clojure.lang.Repl > Error: could not find libjava.so > Error: could not find Java 2 Runtime Environment. Confirmed this on Intel Core 2 Duo systems. On single-core systems java and procfs can coexist. Is it SMP-related bug in procfs implementation? -- Дмитрий А. Панов Администратор ЛВС Государственная Академия Экономики и Права Хабаровск, Россия
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200804011016.20303.fluffy>