Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:48:10 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org Cc: Eivind Eklund <eivind@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: alternative options for ports Message-ID: <200410161348.11392.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20041016081928.GA80039@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <416C0DE8.3000004@struchtrup.com> <20041014162539.GD1301@FreeBSD.org> <20041016081928.GA80039@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2038136.CLn07jzDt3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 16 October 2004 10:19, David O'Brien wrote: >I think our slave > ports is a fine solution issues like this. =46ull ack. A one to one mapping of portdir<->package is always preferrable= to=20 some obfuscated logic and Makefile spaghetti code that just magically=20 produces more than one package from one port. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart2038136.CLn07jzDt3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.10 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBcQp7Xhc68WspdLARAqEKAJ41N3bwiDLkBVCfJvZzTyVgUZhqXgCfTeOq 0e3F193/nQghCrK4NDbHeQQ= =5JZn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2038136.CLn07jzDt3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410161348.11392.michaelnottebrock>