Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:58:55 -0500
From:      Ben Kelly <ben@wanderview.com>
To:        Oleg Bulyzhin <oleg@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, Kevin Smith <kerbzo@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: dummynet issues
Message-ID:  <CB8F37F2-3DF6-4548-8131-9B96F49D29D6@wanderview.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091130234537.GA78185@lath.rinet.ru>
References:  <4B129960.9030107@gmail.com> <4B12B6B9.3030106@bsd.com.br> <4B12C32F.3060709@gmail.com> <4B12C543.2070204@mgwigglesworth.net> <4B141A77.4030102@gmail.com> <20091130201222.GC72710@lath.rinet.ru> <A173B0FA-C964-431C-8DAF-AE4159065111@wanderview.com> <20091130234537.GA78185@lath.rinet.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Nov 30, 2009, at 6:45 PM, Oleg Bulyzhin wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 03:38:50PM -0500, Ben Kelly wrote:
>>=20
>> I've also run into the problem recently on 9-CURRENT (last synced on =
11/13/2009).  My configuration looks like:
>>=20
>=20
> My quick attempt to reproduce the issue failed. Perhaps i'm missing =
something.
>=20
> How are you measuring connection bandwidth?=20

I actually have not measured my bandwidth to validate dummynet.  I have =
simply observed these messages repeating in my log:

  dummynet: OUCH! pipe should have been idle!

Under normal conditions I don't really need the dummynet rules to shape =
traffic for my configuration to work, so it has not been a high priority =
for me yet.  Do you see the log messages?

Thanks.

- Ben=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CB8F37F2-3DF6-4548-8131-9B96F49D29D6>