Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 00:23:37 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> To: nate@yogotech.com Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Firewall config non-intuitiveness Message-ID: <20020127.002337.37328950.imp@village.org> In-Reply-To: <15443.42601.781625.356369@caddis.yogotech.com> References: <15443.41177.259786.242696@caddis.yogotech.com> <3C53A5A2.A5F8FBD6@tenebras.com> <15443.42601.781625.356369@caddis.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You still haven't responded to my comment that I have it setup like this on some of my boxes so that I can do things that don't fit in well with the current firewall paradigm. Nor to my comment that we shouldn't be changing a security feature in a fail*UN*safe way. I'll grant that I might be in the minority here, but I sure don't want my the ability to use my firewall going away after my "next" mergemaster change because you were helpful and unloaded/disabled stuff for me. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020127.002337.37328950.imp>