Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 01:31:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0405280128570.63204-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.60.0405281022360.18426@zeus>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 28 May 2004, Harti Brandt wrote: > On Fri, 28 May 2004, Julian Elischer wrote: > > JE>> If you do that, I suppose you need to edit all the nodes, right?. In that > JE>> case could you please convert the initialisation of the typestructs > JE>> to use C99 sparse initialisation? In that case future changes will be a good > JE>> deal easier. > JE> > JE>actually I don't know if you do need to edit the nodes > JE>types.. At one time it was true that unassigned elements on > JE>the end will be NULL. > > Sure they will, but this will confuse the next one who is adding > a new operation. I was just thinking: 'In the case that Gleb has nothing > else to do he could as well just take the chance...' :-) He seems to have taken the bait (heh heh) It'd be best to make the change to sparse initialisers a separate patch that I cold commit separatly, so reduce teh size of the functionality change patch. (or harti could commit it.., or ruslan) > > harti >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0405280128570.63204-100000>