Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon,  6 Aug 2012 03:05:47 +0200 (CEST)
From:      "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, mailing@remailer.privacy.at, list@remailer.privacy.at
Subject:   Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
Message-ID:  <793d6519ca3648de7634faff1829b9f7@remailer.privacy.at>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208052003030.94918@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

> >> I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS

This is not up for discussion.

> but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. 

Too many iPads, iPhones, etc?

> For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk

If not spelling, or grammar...

> and speed will gonna be the differentiator.

A high-school education may well have been the differentiator, but that's
not important right now. Journaling filesystems are not known for speed.
EXT2 will probably outperform ZFS as far as NFS servers go.

--
Speed "Will" Gonna
Be The Differentiator




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?793d6519ca3648de7634faff1829b9f7>