Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:55:28 -0700 From: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> To: Daniel Mayfield <dan@3geeks.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mismatch between zfs and zpool Message-ID: <CAOjFWZ4hBeBq36XppNrZrnkSC4XCB-2FaDNTGE66Q8NKvUw6Mg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6275E6A5-E7A5-49A2-B15F-1BE2EF131A34@3geeks.org> References: <6275E6A5-E7A5-49A2-B15F-1BE2EF131A34@3geeks.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 27, 2012 5:00 PM, "Daniel Mayfield" <dan@3geeks.org> wrote: > > Any idea why these mismatch? These are WD20EARS disks in a USB JBOD enclosure. > > [dan@rooter ~] $ zfs list > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > mediavg 1.86T 3.33T 314K /media > [dan@rooter ~] $ zpool list > NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT > mediavg 7.25T 2.56T 4.69T 35% 1.00x ONLINE - If you the differences in used/alloc and avail/free between zfs and zpool, it's because they show different things. Search the archives and the zfs-discuss archives for all the gory details. The cliff's notes version is that zpool shows raw storage available in the pool, and zfs shows usable storage space after redundancy is taken into account.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOjFWZ4hBeBq36XppNrZrnkSC4XCB-2FaDNTGE66Q8NKvUw6Mg>