Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 18:22:51 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hypertherading Message-ID: <4A030ADB.9050802@keltia.freenix.fr> In-Reply-To: <32413E83-2059-4A47-AB45-EA7A1A509DD6@gid.co.uk> References: <270637.78561.qm@web63905.mail.re1.yahoo.com> <a31046fc0905061955u4a7b5755ifbcd7bd5641cd954@mail.gmail.com> <32413E83-2059-4A47-AB45-EA7A1A509DD6@gid.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/05/2009 10:17, Bob Bishop wrote: > AFAICS the reference doesn't support that conclusion at all. Nehalem CPUs'HT feature is significantly different from the one present in previous P4 CPUs. Apparently, Nehalem's HT works. Memory bandwidth being much higher helps too. -- Ollivier Robert -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A030ADB.9050802>