Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 13:32:20 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: "David G. Lawrence" <dg@dglawrence.com> Subject: Re: tar -l versus gtar -l Message-ID: <m3llgvi1ff.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20040804022716.GD10301@dragon.nuxi.com> (David O'Brien's message of "Tue, 3 Aug 2004 19:27:16 -0700") References: <40F963D8.6010201@freebsd.org> <200407291159.i6TBxKj01347@Mail.NOSPAM.DynDNS.dK> <4109BA1B.7090609@freebsd.org> <20040730080026.GA46093@nexus.dglawrence.com> <410A78B1.4030608@kientzle.com> <20040801221508.GF75481@nexus.dglawrence.com> <410D894D.7000209@freebsd.org> <20040802010910.GA63402@nexus.dglawrence.com> <410D9957.5020308@freebsd.org> <20040802014353.GA67938@nagual.pp.ru> <20040804022716.GD10301@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: >> POSIX have higher importance. We should ignore any GNUisms in favour of >> POSIX overriding ones (at least to pass POSIX tests suite). > > But past FreeBSD (and BSD) practices should override POSIX. Guys, please remember this is -CURRENT, not -STABLE. Any standards conformance issues we're aware of and that are easily fixed should be ironed out BEFORE going -STABLE or we'll be stuck with them for another five years. -- Matthias Andree Encrypted mail welcome: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95 (PGP/MIME preferred)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m3llgvi1ff.fsf>