Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:02:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org> To: nate@root.org Cc: jhb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/killall killall.1 killall.c src/usr.sbin Makefile src/usr.sbin/jail jail.8 jail.c src/usr.sbin/jexec Makefile jexec.8 jexec.c src/usr.sbin/jls Makefile jls.8 jls.c Message-ID: <200304110602.h3B62T8W066999@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304101108290.31875-100000@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10 Apr, Nate Lawson wrote: > My question was different: since jail already implies > a location in file namespace, why implement a new and disjoint namespace > for it? That was my reaction. Why not just use the path as the ID, unless you want to allow two distinct jails to share the same root directory?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304110602.h3B62T8W066999>