Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:26:04 -0600 From: Peter Schultz <pmes@bis.midco.net> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MFC wishlist Message-ID: <073F2EEC-6125-11D9-9FCA-000D936BE398@bis.midco.net> In-Reply-To: <20050108030707.GA3656@frontfree.net> References: <41DF253C.5040705@fer.hr> <20050108005540.GB93568@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050108030707.GA3656@frontfree.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 7, 2005, at 9:07 PM, Xin LI wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:55:40PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 01:11:40AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: >>> It's been a while now and (judging from this list at least), people >>> are >>> not complaining about ULE, so maybe (with re@ approval) the fix & >>> supporting infrastructure could be brought to RELENG_5? >>> >> >> That's not a good idea. I can lock up ULE+PREEMPTION on >> a dual amd64 system within 30 minutes. The system is >> runnnig X11 and normally firefox (or other threaded >> app) and it simply freezes. No panic. No keyboard >> response. Nothing. > > This is observed in pre-5.3RELEASE CURRENT, but I thought Jeff has > already fixed it in -CURRENT. I don't have dual amd64 system to do > such experiments, are you sure you are talking about the latest > 6-CURRENT, or just 5.3? > > I can lock up this configuration on a dual PII350 6-CURRENT machine in a couple minutes. I never did get a chance to test Jeff's patch, does anyone know if it will still apply cleanly? Pete...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?073F2EEC-6125-11D9-9FCA-000D936BE398>