Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 00:35:27 -0700 From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> To: David Dawes <dawes@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> Cc: ache@astral.msk.su (=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=), hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xterm dumps core Message-ID: <199510190735.AAA29673@corbin.Root.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 19 Oct 95 13:21:24 %2B1000." <199510190321.NAA14906@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>names list registered by IANA).
>>>>ISO8859-1 is _invalid_ name.
>>
>>>I just checked a machine I have running a recent SNAP (951005), and it still
>>>uses the old names. Has this been changed in stable since then?
>>
>>It seems that you still have obsoleted names from previous versions.
>>You need to say "make distrib-dirs" in /usr/src/etc, remove
>>obsoleted dirs and re-build/install /usr/src/bin/{mklocale,colldef} and
>>/usr/src/share/timedef.
>
>I'm using to a clean install of the 2.1.0-951005-SNAP binary set, not
>one I built myself. It has only the old names, and not the new names.
>Is that SNAP incorrect in this regard? What will be in the 2.1.0 release?
Yes, I was forced to bring in the RFC1170 name changes because of
compatibility issues with our ports tree. This was done recently (10 days ago
or so).
-DG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510190735.AAA29673>