Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 05:40:17 GMT From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/95977 Message-ID: <200605040540.k445eHpt031521@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/95977; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> To: Cheng-Lung Sung <clsung@freebsd.org> Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/95977 Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 09:37:47 +0400 (MSD) [...] > Hi, > > I knew that. So is that reasonable to let users easily find > themselves jailed or not? I think yes, by design. You see, there are no reasons to hide the sysctl invented exactly for that and in the same time leave several other methods to guess about jail. Moreover, security.jail.jailed is already used by at least one startup script and allows to re-use the same code for the system and jail startup. -- Maxim Konovalov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200605040540.k445eHpt031521>