Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:54:20 +1000 From: Michael VInce <mv@roq.com> To: Michael VInce <mv@roq.com>, net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: em(4) patch for test Message-ID: <435C68FC.9090506@roq.com> In-Reply-To: <435B3A92.1040600@roq.com> References: <20051020140200.GL59364@cell.sick.ru> <4359FFE3.7060001@roq.com> <20051022091905.GH59364@cell.sick.ru> <435B3A92.1040600@roq.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I just have to point out that below I made a statement that proved I should of gone to bed earlier instead of doing benchmarks :). The 901 http States and ssh state have nothing to do with each other as there on different pf rules. Mike Michael VInce wrote: > I did watch the gateway (B) pf state table and did an ab test with and > without pf running, I didn't see any difference in results when having > pf running with stateful rules, ab's Time per requests stayed low and > transfer rates stayed high. Most of the time the total states were > exactly 900 (plus 1 for ssh session) which would make sense > considering the 900 keep-alive concurrency level on the ab test. > > pftop output > RULE ACTION DIR LOG Q IF PR K PKTS BYTES STATES MAX > INFO > 0 Pass In Q em2 tcp M 37362067 1856847K 901 > inet from any to server-c port = http > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?435C68FC.9090506>