Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 31 Dec 2015 19:37:14 +0000 (UTC)
From:      Devin Teske <dteske@FreeBSD.org>
To:        src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   svn commit: r293000 - head/sys/boot/forth
Message-ID:  <201512311937.tBVJbEHC022789@repo.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Author: dteske
Date: Thu Dec 31 19:37:14 2015
New Revision: 293000
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/293000

Log:
  Remove supposition comment that code would better live elsewhere.
  Thinking this through, and looking at process_assignment, I believe
  moving the code would be wrong considering that set_conf_files is
  called in one condition while set_nextboot_conf is guarded by a
  different condition of having nextboot_enable="YES". So these must
  stay separated and not combined.
  
  MFC after:	1 week

Modified:
  head/sys/boot/forth/support.4th

Modified: head/sys/boot/forth/support.4th
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/boot/forth/support.4th	Thu Dec 31 19:33:17 2015	(r292999)
+++ head/sys/boot/forth/support.4th	Thu Dec 31 19:37:14 2015	(r293000)
@@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ only forth also support-functions also f
   s" loader_conf_files" getenv conf_files string=
 ;
 
-: set_nextboot_conf \ XXX maybe do as set_conf_files ?
+: set_nextboot_conf
   value_buffer strget unquote nextboot_conf_file string=
 ;
 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201512311937.tBVJbEHC022789>