Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 15:02:32 -0500 (EST) From: <scanner@jurai.net> To: Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au> Cc: Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>, louie@TransSys.COM, committers@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001061501001.70450-100000@sasami.jurai.net> In-Reply-To: <200001060927.UAA03779@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 6 Jan 100, Darren Reed wrote: > For what it's worth, I think releasing 4.0 *without* IPv6 support > is a mistake. Why ? Because in < 12 months FreeBSD 5.0 will be > released *with* IPv6 support (I'd count IPv6 as being a big enough > change to signify a major release number change). If that doesn't > happen, then FreeBSD is chasing the wrong goals, IMHO. I would like to agree with darren on this one. And think IPv6 should go into 4.0 even if the date needs to be pushed back. It is a major release and adding v6 is a major change. Thats just my 2 cents anyway. Chris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0001061501001.70450-100000>